|
Post by Stephen Mawson on Aug 11, 2009 16:47:43 GMT
I seriously don't want to play the same person with the same army three times in a row, that sounds pretty boring.
If you wanted to add a little variety you could swap armies for the second game, meaning you play the first game with your own army, then have to use your opponents troops against your own stuff. Could be fun.
|
|
|
Post by Robert Walker on Aug 11, 2009 16:49:37 GMT
yeh, that sounds good
three battles of the same type against the same opponent would get boring
|
|
|
Post by wstevens on Aug 12, 2009 0:25:39 GMT
Well this would get a little silly if we have the armies in different lists and then play a member of team A as a member of team B. If you won both games you wouldn't need to play the third.
However to make it less boring - I would want to go with a round robin - but with all the want in the world I know - no - I really know that someone will not play ball and not turn up. This would be devastating. To counter this we could have three games the same night against different players for example.
Myself, Simon and James vs Julie, Steve and Andy.
Now someone said playing the same army would be boring. I'm afraid this would be partly your own faults in choosing identical Imperial Roman armies. There are four of them! Plus a Republican Roman army and a late Roman army. That's half of the teams being Roman. So forgive me when I tsk! just a bit - I wouldn't moan about playing the same army - you will be and you have the choices of others to thank. Myself I don't really care if I play the same type army again - in this it can't be helped.
I will redo the draw keeping the original teams drawn and the skirmish draw - but I will group the individual battles. Here will be the essence of the round robin. I will post up in a new message please see above.
|
|