|
Post by carl on Aug 15, 2008 16:13:42 GMT
Kevin; please READ my previous messages nowhere in ANY of them does it say you CANNOT run a FOW table, so to say i have is rather disconcerting. if you dont want to do extra buildings for the other table thats not a problem but please do not accuse me of stealing your idea as the idea for the Bulge game came from Matt and would be on the snow boards whilst yours would be on other boards. Two totally different scenarios on two totally different set up tables. i have asked you on numerous occasions about BUYING buildings from you either via the club or for my own use and you have not taken up the offer so please do not go on about the costs you have incurred, as i thought the whole point of you buying them WAS to copy them and sell the ones you make. an apology from you over the above would be apreciated as as far as i am concerned i have done nothing wrong and i object to you saying my behaviour has been outrageous.
|
|
|
Post by kevin1shakeandmake on Aug 15, 2008 17:32:41 GMT
Carl as much as I like you most of the time an apology from you would be more appropriate or a change in who gets to do what and when instead of the usual dictatorial stance, look yes looks wise my village would have put your scenario to shame and I will give you some free buildings, bocarge etc but the way you have excluded me is discraceful as I stated earlier I will not enter FOW at Kelmarsh 2009 you have won. I will complete the village as I have started a weekley club in my snooker room for Napoleonics and FOW only initially. Being the fair and reasonable person that I am I will bear no grudge or malice against you and still give you some buildings bocarge etc when I have cast them.
|
|
|
Post by carl on Aug 15, 2008 17:40:18 GMT
i have not been dictatorial in anything over next years event. because a lot more people want to put forward scenarios for next year all i said was (and stephen has mentioned this as well in an earlier post) when all the ideas were in we would ALL sit down and discuss what we are going to do next time. i have NEVER said you cannot run a flames game and maybe the buildings would have put some of the others to shame but surely that is not the attitude to take as we are a club at an event it is NOT a competition to see whose table is better than the rest. please inform me where i have excluded you as you put it? ? anyone reading the posts above will see i have not excluded anyone or anything from next years event. just because Matt has put forward an idea for a flames game does not mean it will get in over yours and vice versa. as i said earlier there is plenty of room for 2 fow games if required. it is up to you if you give the club some stuff once you have done it. also, i am intrigued to know what you mean by most of the time 'I' should apologise, what for in particular?
|
|
|
Post by kevin1shakeandmake on Aug 15, 2008 17:46:40 GMT
Carl I will still give you the buildings bocage etc when I cast them, your table will look great, you have won again.
|
|
|
Post by carl on Aug 15, 2008 18:02:48 GMT
Kevin; what is annoying about your post is basically you say i have won but ONCE AGAIN i will reiterate IT IS NOT A BLOOMING COMPETITION. your posts have been irresponsible and sometimes i wonder if you write things just to try and stir up trouble. READ my previous posts and you will see that nowhere does it state that KEVIN CANNOT RUN A FLAMES OF WAR GAME AT KELMARSH NEXT YEAR. if you dont want to do one fine, just dont put me as the reason you dont want to do it or to lay the blame at my door. the game matt and i want to run is not a definate for next year as ALL ideas are in the same boat until we decide AS A CLUB what we want to do next year (based on what people have or are willing to purchase). i wish you would read through all the posts and you will see how massively you have over-reacted and when you do i would still like an apology for saying that i have treated you disgustingly when clearly i HAVE NOT.
|
|
|
Post by Stephen Mawson on Aug 15, 2008 18:37:42 GMT
I think this has gone rather off topic. This thread is for discussing prospective scenario's for Kelmarsh 2009.
If you want to discuss the merits, or lack thereof, in the club's scenario selection policy start another thread to do it in.
|
|
|
Post by kevin1shakeandmake on Aug 15, 2008 18:53:54 GMT
Carl I think your missing the point here, you and I know what words have been exchanged on this topic posts and conversation and yet again I have been treated terribly but let us put that to one side the club is not run correctly and this is why I will be playing Gavin after his holiday on the 27th to finish a game of Napoleonics and then I am finished with the club as I will also be too busy running my own club where all people will have a voice and more importantly play an enjoyable came free from any issues, controversy and qualified doughnuts.
|
|
|
Post by kevin1shakeandmake on Aug 15, 2008 18:58:19 GMT
Stephen when another vote is cast 9 to 11 ( it was actually 6 to 11) anyway that means the 11 wins not the 9 as 11 is greater than 9.
re the club is not run correctly.
|
|
|
Post by carl on Aug 15, 2008 19:01:26 GMT
Kevin; fine if thats the way you feel. i still cant see how you have been treated terribly as no-one has said you cant run a game but its up to you. this ends my involvement in this discussion.
|
|
|
Post by Stephen Mawson on Aug 15, 2008 20:58:44 GMT
This thread has now been locked due to peoples inability to remain on topic.
I will summarize the scenario proposals later in another thread. Once that's done this thread will be removed.
|
|